Exchange Ethers and ethereum to paypal account dollars or euro, easy way to cash out ethereum funds into real money with high market value, just place order on this website.
Friday, June 24, 2022
Tuesday, June 21, 2022
“If he's ready to go, people in this party are ready to back him up" , CNN’s Van Jones joins Erin Burnett on concerns of President Biden's age or stamina if he runs in 2024.
“If he's ready to go, people in this party are ready to back him up" , CNN’s Van Jones joins Erin Burnett on concerns of President Biden's age or stamina if he runs in 2024. |
Posted: 21 Jun 2022 09:01 PM PDT "Outnumbered" co-host Kayleigh McEnany said on Monday CNN commentator Van Jones calling the Democratic Party "weird" and "elitist" are the same sentiments he had years ago when Donald Trump launched... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
Posted: 21 Jun 2022 08:38 PM PDT !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.c... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
You are subscribed to email updates from www.Tranganhnam.xyz. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
Monday, June 20, 2022
CNN correspondent John Harwood defended President Biden's mental state against claims from Democratic strategists and media pundits that he's too old.
CNN correspondent John Harwood defended President Biden's mental state against claims from Democratic strategists and media pundits that he's too old. |
Posted: 19 Jun 2022 08:44 PM PDT A new column in The Atlantic argues that Biden should not run for reelection because "he is too old." CNN's John Harwood reacts to the argument and puts it into... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
You are subscribed to email updates from www.Tranganhnam.xyz. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
Sunday, June 19, 2022
MSNBC panel wonders if Ginni Thomas should be ‘perp-walked’ by Jan. 6 Committee
MSNBC panel wonders if Ginni Thomas should be ‘perp-walked’ by Jan. 6 Committee |
- MSNBC panel wonders if Ginni Thomas should be ‘perp-walked’ by Jan. 6 Committee
- 'I'd been running away from it' Katy Tur on telling her story in new memoir, 'Rough Draft'
- Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and NSC Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby
- CNN’s favorite anti-Trump lawyer just pled guilty to 5 more charges, could get up to 83 years in prison…
MSNBC panel wonders if Ginni Thomas should be ‘perp-walked’ by Jan. 6 Committee Posted: 19 Jun 2022 02:05 AM PDT "One effective thing that the committee has done is that they really showed that everyone knew that this is a lie. Everyone around Trump was saying this is wrong and you cannot do this." Lucym... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
'I'd been running away from it' Katy Tur on telling her story in new memoir, 'Rough Draft' Posted: 18 Jun 2022 10:54 PM PDT !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.c... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
Posted: 18 Jun 2022 07:42 PM PDT !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.c... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
Posted: 18 Jun 2022 06:06 PM PDT CNN's favorite anti-Trump lawyer, Michael Avenatti, how was just convicted for defrauding Stormy Daniels, has just pled guilty to five more criminal charges that could land him 83 years in prison... Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon! |
You are subscribed to email updates from www.Tranganhnam.xyz. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
Bill Barr Can’t Flee The Stench Of What He Did For Trump
Attorney General Bill Barr revealed many things at the Jan. 6 Committee hearing on Monday.
But for me, the biggest impression his testimony left was the depths he reached in serving Trump.
Barr narrated the period of time from Nov. 3, Election Day, until he departed on Dec. 23. Over those seven weeks, Barr recounted how Trump began to reach for wilder and wilder claims that might explain why he was not the loser in the election, but rather, the victim of mass electoral fraud.
To do that, Barr also described how he himself became enmeshed in voter fraud investigations, not only pursuing claims that he admitted that he knew were bogus, but also apparently taking a personal role in investigations normally conducted by line prosecutors.
Barr recalled a meeting with Trump he had in early December, after he had made a point of telling the Associated Press that the DOJ had not found evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election.
Trump began to discuss claims of fraud in Detroit. The attorney general was prepared. "At that point, I knew the exact number of precincts in Detroit," Barr narrated.
See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'
It's one example, but it points to a level of granularity that's typically unfamiliar to attorneys general, tasked with overseeing national law enforcement policy.
But let's look at what else Barr told the committee about the voter fraud allegations.
"I was influenced by the fact that all the early claims that I understood were completely bogus and silly and usually based on complete misinformation," Barr said.
A few things are odd here. One is the presumption that any of the claims might have been made in good faith, considering what they alleged, the people making them and the chain of events — including Trump's refusal to concede — that led to them being made.
See Also: Joy Behar said on "The View" on Monday that inflation and high gas prices were a "worldwide problem" and largely blamed the baby formula shortage on Republicans.
Barr himself boosted the suggestion that Democrats would use mail-in voting to steal the election before November, saying at one point that the Democrats were "creating an incendiary situation where there's going to be loss of confidence in the vote, it'll be a close vote. People will say 'The President won Nevada — oh, wait a minute! We just discovered a hundred thousand ballots, every vote must be counted!'"
See Also: Here's the Story with Kyrsten Sinema
After the election took place, Barr removed a longstanding DOJ policy which banned voter fraud investigations until after the results had been certified. That decision accepted the premise of the claims that Trump was making, and also led to the resignation of the head of the DOJ's election crimes branch.
See Also: NBC Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor and former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade join Andrea Mitchell to discuss key challenges facing the January 6 Committee ahead of their primetime hearings this week: getting a "distracted nation" to pay attention and understand what's at stake. "I think the biggest challenge for lawmakers here, as they talk about these sort of huge ideas of American democracy and sort of the experiment that we're all living in, benefiting from, possibly being brought to his knees, is whether or not they can make people care," says Alcindor. "The American public has been groomed to expect high value quick entertainment," says McQuade. "I think putting together a polished show can be very important."
Barr also told the committee about a mid-November meeting that he held with Trump.
See Also: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dodges on whether she'll support Biden in 2024, focuses on midterms: 'That's not a yes'
"The department doesn't take sides in elections. The department is not an extension of your legal team," Barr recalled telling the former President.
Look what he said next:
"Our role is to investigate fraud and we'll look at something if it's specific, credible and could affect the outcome of the election. We're doing that. It's just not meritorious. It's not panning out."
Who made the "specific, credible" claims of voter fraud? Did anybody do so in 2020? If so, please let me know. Otherwise, it seems that Barr was willing to let the DOJ become, in his phrasing, "an extension of [Trump's] legal team," investigating voter fraud claims that could not affect the outcome of the election.
In spite of all this, Barr has still said that he would vote for Trump, the would-be election thief, again in 2024.
And, perhaps more to the point, even as the attempt to subvert the 2020 election was going on, Barr couldn't help but offer Trump cloying praise in his resignation letter.
"Your record is all the more historic because you accomplished it in the face of relentless, implacable resistance," Barr wrote in that missive.
See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'
How Republicans Screwed Themselves With The Jan. 6 Committee: A Retrospective
In his opening statement of the first public hearing, Jan. 6 committee chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) reminded listeners of the different, and likely more toothless, version of the panel he and his fellow Democrats were clamoring for around this time last summer.
"My colleagues and I all wanted an outside, independent commission to investigate January 6th, similar to what we had after 9/11," he said. "But after first agreeing to the idea, Donald Trump's allies in Congress put a stop to it. Apparently, they don't want January 6th investigated at all."
It's a callback to a time when short-sighted Republicans saved Democrats from a version of the fact-finding effort that Trump's allies could have much more easily obstructed.
See Also: Joy Behar said on "The View" on Monday that inflation and high gas prices were a "worldwide problem" and largely blamed the baby formula shortage on Republicans.
Back then, as Thompson recalled, Democrats hungered for a commission in the vaunted 9/11 model — resolutely bipartisan and largely unanimous. Most Republicans, after some initial and short-lived endorsement of a theoretical independent commission, didn't really want to investigate the insurrection at all beyond a superficial look at Capitol security weak spots.
See Also: Here's the Story with Kyrsten Sinema
Still, Reps. John Katko (R-NY) and Thompson, leaders of the House Homeland Security committee, got to work outlining the contours of an independent commission in spring 2021. The former reportedly did so at House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-CA) behest.
See Also: NBC Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor and former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade join Andrea Mitchell to discuss key challenges facing the January 6 Committee ahead of their primetime hearings this week: getting a "distracted nation" to pay attention and understand what's at stake. "I think the biggest challenge for lawmakers here, as they talk about these sort of huge ideas of American democracy and sort of the experiment that we're all living in, benefiting from, possibly being brought to his knees, is whether or not they can make people care," says Alcindor. "The American public has been groomed to expect high value quick entertainment," says McQuade. "I think putting together a polished show can be very important."
Their design was so emphatically collaborative that it would have given the recalcitrant Republicans extensive control over the investigation: Republican cooperation was required to issue each subpoena; the commission's final report was due not later than the last day of 2021, well before the midterms; the non-lawmaker appointees would have been evenly split between the two parties, increasing the chances of a partisan schism.
See Also: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dodges on whether she'll support Biden in 2024, focuses on midterms: 'That's not a yes'
"I ask you to set aside politics just this once," Katko implored his colleagues from the House floor, banging on the lectern to punctuate his words. "Just this once — I beg you — and pass this bill."
But Republican leadership had turned on the idea. McCarthy, at the eleventh hour, urged his members to vote against the legislation he'd asked Katko to help draft. Thirty-five of them voted for it anyway.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), too, pressured his members to oppose the bill. Republican leadership found it easier, on the whole, to write Katko out of the story, the better to decry the panel as a brainchild of Democratic leadership.
"I've made the decision to oppose the House Democrats' slanted and unbalanced proposal for another commission to study the events of January the 6th," McConnell said from the Senate floor.
Six Republicans ignored his guidance, four fewer than were needed to overcome the filibuster.
And the independent commission, one which Republicans could have manipulated far more easily than its current iteration, was dead. Katko announced that he'd retire from the House a few months later.
See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'
With the Senate effectively out of the picture, the drama moved back to the House, where Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) could unilaterally set up a select committee staffed by current lawmakers.
With Republicans having rejected a format much more amenable to their interests, Democrats had all the advantages. Pelosi would appoint 13 members, though she'd "consult" with McCarthy on five of them. Her chosen chair would have unilateral subpoena power, and the committee could take all the time it wanted on the investigation.
McCarthy announced his picks: Reps. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Jim Banks (R-IN), Troy Nehls (R-TX), Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) and Rodney Davis (R-IL). Pelosi rejected the Jims.
Jordan and Banks, along with Nehls who she okayed, had voted against certifying the 2020 Electoral College vote. All five Republicans voted against impeaching then-President Donald Trump after the insurrection.
See Also: Joy Behar said on "The View" on Monday that inflation and high gas prices were a "worldwide problem" and largely blamed the baby formula shortage on Republicans.
"With respect for the integrity of the investigation, with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members, I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee," Pelosi said in a statement.
See Also: Here's the Story with Kyrsten Sinema
In a fit of pique, McCarthy held a high-volume press conference, declaring that if the Reps. Jims couldn't serve, none of his picks would. An indignant Nehls, waving his prop inches from McCarthy's face, pointed out that he'd already prepared a binder and everything.
See Also: NBC Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor and former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade join Andrea Mitchell to discuss key challenges facing the January 6 Committee ahead of their primetime hearings this week: getting a "distracted nation" to pay attention and understand what's at stake. "I think the biggest challenge for lawmakers here, as they talk about these sort of huge ideas of American democracy and sort of the experiment that we're all living in, benefiting from, possibly being brought to his knees, is whether or not they can make people care," says Alcindor. "The American public has been groomed to expect high value quick entertainment," says McQuade. "I think putting together a polished show can be very important."
Pelosi, who by that point had appointed Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) to the committee, shrugged. The committee would be bipartisan either way, she pointed out. A few days after McCarthy withdrew the rest of his picks, Pelosi appointed Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) as well.
See Also: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dodges on whether she'll support Biden in 2024, focuses on midterms: 'That's not a yes'
"Our members all regret that the initial hope for an independent commission to investigate this was derailed by allies to the former president after details were agreed by both parties," a Jan. 6 committee aide told reporters last week.
The members may regret it. But the American people, who are learning details and connections unearthed by a serious panel featuring Republicans who lack the power and desire to derail the investigation in favor of their party's political prospects, are better for it.
MBS Broke Us
Sometimes the biggest things happening in the world are happening out of view. Sometimes they're hidden but just as often they simply don't get the attention they should because they don't have traction as news stories. Or perhaps all the players have their own interests in not drawing attention to them. You may have noticed that Joe Biden is traveling to Saudi Arabia next month and that he plans to hold a summit with the de facto ruler of the country, Mohammed bin Salman — usually called MBS. He's going to Riyadh. MBS is not coming to Washington. This is presented as a full reset of relations between the two countries and — though this is stated less directly — a full reset with MBS. So all that human-rights, Yemen-war, Jamal-Khashoggi-being-dismembered-at-a-consulate-in-Istanbul stuff is done with. That was then. This is now.
So why would the U.S. do this? Well, that's pretty straightforward. We have no choice. The Saudis, and really MBS, has played the most brass knuckle kind of hardball with the U.S. And he's won. I don't think there's any other way to put it. There's a complex set of causes behind the inflation that currently plagues the U.S. and global economy. The exact interplay between supply chain disruption, pent-up demand from the pandemic, demand driven by stimulus spending, changed work and leisure patterns driven by the pandemic isn't clear. The relative importance of each is a matter of on-going controversy. But a critical part of the equation is energy prices — both in their political impact and as a driver in the economy overall.
For many decades, Saudi Arabia has been the key player in the global oil market. That is not only as one of the largest producers but as the producer with the greatest production elasticity. Put simply, the Saudis can dial up supply quickly if they want to. And that means they have an outsized impact on global prices. For the last year and a half the U.S. has needed the Saudis to step in and hike production very, very badly. That's both for the health of the U.S. economy and for Joe Biden's political fortunes. And MBS has consistently said, no. Why should I? What have you done for me lately? All I hear is that I'm a pariah and now you want my help? Being tight with the Trump family and particularly Jared Kushner hasn't hurt certainly. There are numerous reasons why MBS is more aligned with U.S. Republicans and more autocratic rulers around the world. But the biggest thing here is likely simply to be respected and power.
The Saudis didn't cause the economic trajectory of the last 18 months. But they could have altered it very substantially. They didn't. And they refused against a gusher of U.S. demands and pleas.
This hasn't all been to stick it to the U.S. and the Biden administration. After all, the Saudis and other producer states have been making a fortune. There is also Russia's new partnership with OPEC through OPEC+. That's weighed in the balance too. But that's another part of the same equation. The Saudis have been more solicitous of Russia than the U.S. This has all come even more to the fore after the Russian invasion of Ukraine which put even greater pressure on global energy supplies — oil and natural gas. It may be Ukraine that finally forced the White House to cry uncle.
See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'
The Saudis have us over a barrel. Now we're suing for peace. Not a pretty picture. But we have no choice.