Sunday, June 19, 2022

MBS Broke Us



Sometimes the biggest things happening in the world are happening out of view. Sometimes they're hidden but just as often they simply don't get the attention they should because they don't have traction as news stories. Or perhaps all the players have their own interests in not drawing attention to them. You may have noticed that Joe Biden is traveling to Saudi Arabia next month and that he plans to hold a summit with the de facto ruler of the country, Mohammed bin Salman — usually called MBS. He's going to Riyadh. MBS is not coming to Washington. This is presented as a full reset of relations between the two countries and — though this is stated less directly — a full reset with MBS. So all that human-rights, Yemen-war, Jamal-Khashoggi-being-dismembered-at-a-consulate-in-Istanbul stuff is done with. That was then. This is now.

See Also:  Whoopi Goldberg says 'both sides' guilty of rhetoric like Schumer's against Kavanaugh, must 'be more careful'

So why would the U.S. do this? Well, that's pretty straightforward. We have no choice. The Saudis, and really MBS, has played the most brass knuckle kind of hardball with the U.S. And he's won. I don't think there's any other way to put it. There's a complex set of causes behind the inflation that currently plagues the U.S. and global economy. The exact interplay between supply chain disruption, pent-up demand from the pandemic, demand driven by stimulus spending, changed work and leisure patterns driven by the pandemic isn't clear. The relative importance of each is a matter of on-going controversy. But a critical part of the equation is energy prices — both in their political impact and as a driver in the economy overall.

See Also: Texas Rep Jasmine Crockett blamed Republicans for shooting: 'The blood of these children' is on their hands

For many decades, Saudi Arabia has been the key player in the global oil market. That is not only as one of the largest producers but as the producer with the greatest production elasticity. Put simply, the Saudis can dial up supply quickly if they want to. And that means they have an outsized impact on global prices. For the last year and a half the U.S. has needed the Saudis to step in and hike production very, very badly. That's both for the health of the U.S. economy and for Joe Biden's political fortunes. And MBS has consistently said, no. Why should I? What have you done for me lately? All I hear is that I'm a pariah and now you want my help? Being tight with the Trump family and particularly Jared Kushner hasn't hurt certainly. There are numerous reasons why MBS is more aligned with U.S. Republicans and more autocratic rulers around the world. But the biggest thing here is likely simply to be respected and power.

See Also: CNN media analyst on Kimmel interview: Biden could use 'exposure' that isn't 'too challenging' for him

The Saudis didn't cause the economic trajectory of the last 18 months. But they could have altered it very substantially. They didn't. And they refused against a gusher of U.S. demands and pleas.

See Also: CNN correspondent Whitney Wild downplayed the violent threat against Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life and warned about political violence from both sides, after an armed man was arrested outside the justice's home, Wednesday.  

This hasn't all been to stick it to the U.S. and the Biden administration. After all, the Saudis and other producer states have been making a fortune. There is also Russia's new partnership with OPEC through OPEC+. That's weighed in the balance too. But that's another part of the same equation. The Saudis have been more solicitous of Russia than the U.S. This has all come even more to the fore after the Russian invasion of Ukraine which put even greater pressure on global energy supplies — oil and natural gas. It may be Ukraine that finally forced the White House to cry uncle.

See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'

The Saudis have us over a barrel. Now we're suing for peace. Not a pretty picture. But we have no choice.

See Also:  "The View" co-host Joy Behar said Wednesday that gun laws would change "once Black people get guns in this country."

Remind Me Why We Have Sheriffs?

I hope you get a chance to read Matt Shuham's feature piece today about "constitutional sheriff" Dar Leaf. It really brings together the current rage for Trump era "voter fraud" conspiracy theories and our much longer-term interest in far-right anti-government radicalism. When I got to thinking about this a few weeks ago it suddenly occurred to me that almost always when there was one of these figures it was a sheriff. In this case I'm not talking about the so-called "constitutional sheriffs," though that's a big part of it. I'm talking about Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona or Alex Villanueva in LA County, David Clarke in Milwaukee. Like I said, these guys are always the sheriffs.

See Also:  NBC Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor and former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade join Andrea Mitchell to discuss key challenges facing the January 6 Committee ahead of their primetime hearings this week: getting a "distracted nation" to pay attention and understand what's at stake. "I think the biggest challenge for lawmakers here, as they talk about these sort of huge ideas of American democracy and sort of the experiment that we're all living in, benefiting from, possibly being brought to his knees, is whether or not they can make people care," says Alcindor. "The American public has been groomed to expect high value quick entertainment," says McQuade. "I think putting together a polished show can be very important."

One of the big reasons I think is that sheriffs often aren't tied into a formal system of political accountability or responsibility. They're usually elected of course and that's a fundamental accountability. But a city police force and its leadership, for all their problems, are responsible for public safety and usually report to politically accountable people — the mayor, the city council and so forth. They may have some degree of independence. But they're seldom totally independent. Needless to say this police force accountability does not always work perfectly. But at least the structure is there. Sheriffs departments are often an extra layer of police power in a region that already has a policing authority.

 See Also: CNN correspondent Whitney Wild downplayed the violent threat against Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life and warned about political violence from both sides, after an armed man was arrested outside the justice's home, Wednesday.  

Of course, a big part of the problem is precisely the accountability: They're elected. We don't usually elect the police chief. They usually report to a civilian. Yet another reason mimics our national political dynamics. Since sheriffs are county officials they often get political power from more suburban and rural areas but have varying degrees of authority in urban areas, often sharing that authority with police departments which have responsibility for ordinary crime. All of these factors spurs a great temptation for freelancing, a big temptation for highly politicized mischief.

See Also:  Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dodges on whether she'll support Biden in 2024, focuses on midterms: 'That's not a yes'

I'm only scratching the surface here of course. The precise nature of the office varies greatly in different states. But we've been following right-wing radicalism for many years, somehow this only really hit me quite recently. I knew it like everyone else at some level. But I'd just never focused on it, maybe because it is in fact right there in the open: it's always the sheriffs.

See Also: Pelosi defends not passing a bill, claims Supreme Court Justices aren't in any danger despite assassination attempt this week…

Turns Out John Eastman Was Invited To Give Ginni Thomas’ Group A ‘Status Update’ In Dec. 2020



Remember John Eastman, Donald Trump's chief election theft legal advisor?

See Also: Pelosi defends not passing a bill, claims Supreme Court Justices aren't in any danger despite assassination attempt this week…

And remember when, after he was subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 Committee, Eastman unsuccessfully attempted to keep private a group of emails that he said concerned "civic minded citizens of a conservative viewpoint who meet semi-regularly to socialize and discuss issues of public concern"? The group, apparently, had a "high-profile leader." 

See Also:  Whoopi Goldberg says 'both sides' guilty of rhetoric like Schumer's against Kavanaugh, must 'be more careful'

That prompted a good deal of speculation — including at TPM — about just who that high-profile leader might be. We had some ideas.

See Also: Texas Rep Jasmine Crockett blamed Republicans for shooting: 'The blood of these children' is on their hands 

Well, now we have confirmation: The group was apparently one that included Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and a right-wing activist heavily involved in her own right in the effort to steal a second Trump term. 

See Also: CNN media analyst on Kimmel interview: Biden could use 'exposure' that isn't 'too challenging' for him

After an explosive pair of articles this week describing fresh committee records detailing the correspondence between the two, Eastman on Thursday acknowledged reality himself, posting a copy of a Dec. 4 invitation from Ginni Thomas for him to speak to her group "Frontliners" four days later, and to present "a status update to a group of grassroots state leaders."

See Also: CNN correspondent Whitney Wild downplayed the violent threat against Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life and warned about political violence from both sides, after an armed man was arrested outside the justice's home, Wednesday.  

Eastman didn't confirm outright that the invitation he described was the same correspondence he tried to keep hidden from the committee, but the details of both records appear to match up.

See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'

Don't worry, Eastman said, that thing where he wrote on Dec. 24 that "I understand that there is a heated fight underway" within the Supreme Court — that definitely wasn't based on insider knowledge from the Thomas family.

See Also:  "The View" co-host Joy Behar said Wednesday that gun laws would change "once Black people get guns in this country."

"I can categorically confirm that at no time did I discuss with Mrs. Thomas or Justice Thomas any matters pending or likely to come before the Court," he said in a blog post Thursday. "We have never engaged in such discussions, would not engage in such discussions, and did not do so in December 2020 or anytime else." 

See Also:  Joy Reid accuses Republicans of thriving on 'demographic panic,' says GOP wants no one to feel 'safe'

Eastman claims, instead, he was relying on internet rumors published on conservative websites. He pointed to one example from the Vision Times. As the Washington Post's Philip Bump pointed out yesterday, unfounded stories about a supposed fight among the justices were spread across the internet, and even made their way into Trump's election-theft litigation.

See Also:  Sara Haines asked Sen. Chris Murphy if the Republican Party is going further right during Tuesday's episode of "The View."

But that's not to say he wasn't in touch with Ginni Thomas at all! "As you can see for yourselves, she invited me to give an update about election litigation to a group she met with periodically," Eastman said. 

See Also:  Joy Behar said on "The View" on Monday that inflation and high gas prices were a "worldwide problem" and largely blamed the baby formula shortage on Republicans.

See! Nothing to worry about. 

See Also:  Here's the Story with Kyrsten Sinema

Thomas, for her part, sent dozens of emails to state lawmakers pressuring them to overturn the election results. The committee has requested an interview with Thomas, who told the Daily Caller Thursday that she "can't wait to clear up misconceptions."

See Also:  NBC Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor and former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade join Andrea Mitchell to discuss key challenges facing the January 6 Committee ahead of their primetime hearings this week: getting a "distracted nation" to pay attention and understand what's at stake. "I think the biggest challenge for lawmakers here, as they talk about these sort of huge ideas of American democracy and sort of the experiment that we're all living in, benefiting from, possibly being brought to his knees, is whether or not they can make people care," says Alcindor. "The American public has been groomed to expect high value quick entertainment," says McQuade. "I think putting together a polished show can be very important."

The Curious Jan 6 Moonwalk of ‘Team Normal’



There he was, on tape if not in person: Bill Stepien, the very campaign manager of Donald Trump's 2020 reelection campaign, explaining calmly and matter of factly that President Trump lost, he and the candidate knew he had lost and every conspiracy theory and false claim and desperate attempt to stay in power was in the words of Bill Barr, bullshit. It wasn't even begrudging nor presented as an admission. Just matter of fact.

See Also: Ana Navarro loses it during CNN gun control panel: 'Get your a--es in gear and call your Senators!'

Since polls now routinely show that Republican voters treat it as an orthodoxy that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump, this was quite a thing to hear. Other than the candidate himself, a campaign manager speaks with more authority and knowledge about a campaign than anyone else. Indeed, often with considerably more than the candidate. This has been one of the most notable dimensions of the Jan. 6th hearings to date. The witnesses are mostly Republicans and they're all friendly witnesses. Indeed, a lot of them are among the ex-President's most diehard loyalists. Seeing faces you're more accustomed to seeing on Fox News railing against the Deep State now calmly explaining how the President lost the election fair and square can't help but be jarring.

See Also:  "The View" co-host Joy Behar said Wednesday that gun laws would change "once Black people get guns in this country."

And that wasn't all. House Republicans have been saying for months that their top agenda item in 2023, if they reclaim the House, will be vengeance for the Jan. 6th committee investigation. Given how they've spoken about it one might have expected a 24/7 war room operation, counter-programming the hearings and defending the President. And yet elected Republicans have been conspicuously silent. Aside from some introductory whining they seem inclined to sit it out.

See Also:  Joy Reid accuses Republicans of thriving on 'demographic panic,' says GOP wants no one to feel 'safe'

What starts to seem clear is that many elected Republicans are quite content to let Democrats and Liz Cheney knock Donald Trump off the electoral stage for them. Or at least knock enough polish off him to make the 2024 election a much more distant prospect. To be clear, this isn't yet another prediction that "the fever is finally breaking." Republicans seem just as wedded to Trumpism. They just don't care about Trump himself. And that gets to another oddity about Bill Stepien as our representative Trumper. From his testimony and proud embrace of being on "Team Normal" you'd hardly guess that he is currently running the primary campaign of Harriet Hageman, who is attempting to unseat outcast Republican Liz Cheney. The entire premise and point of the Hageman campaign is the Big Lie and Cheney's refusal to accept it. It is entirely a creation of Team Trump. And yet Stepien is running it as a self-identified member in good standing of Team Normal.

See Also:  Sara Haines asked Sen. Chris Murphy if the Republican Party is going further right during Tuesday's episode of "The View."


Did we miss something? Is he not really on Team Normal after all? Is he quitting the Hageman campaign? They've somehow washed their hands of Trump and the Big Lie while continuing to get them dirty again every day on the campaign trail running the campaign of candidates who won't stop talking about it. They seem to have jettisoned Trump's losing nonsense and shown up on Team Normal without any intermediate step of how they got from one place to another. No change of mind, no denunciation, almost like there's no rather glaring contradiction, like nothing happened at all. They're moonwalking away from Jan. 6th and the Big Lie while somehow pretending that it scarcely had anything to do with him in the first place and all the while running the political party for whom the Big Lie is the centerpiece doctrine.

See Also:  Joy Behar said on "The View" on Monday that inflation and high gas prices were a "worldwide problem" and largely blamed the baby formula shortage on Republicans.

Important Stuff, Truly Must-See



I mentioned a few days ago that the most compelling part of the Jan 6 committee hearings so far for me has been the description of the particulars of how the breach of the Capitol complex happened. The story is usually presented as something like this. There was a big group of angry and potentially violent Trumpers. There was a much smaller group, maybe as few as a few dozens of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers with a more focused ideology, a clearer plan of the insurrection and so forth. They were both more eager to get violent and had a lot more experience getting violent. But they were in the extreme minority of the people up there. So even though they're now the ones facing serious charges including seditious conspiracy they are only a small part of what happened.

See Also: Pelosi defends not passing a bill, claims Supreme Court Justices aren't in any danger despite assassination attempt this week…

The committee did a good job of explaining that that's not at all what happened. In fact, these two groups were acting as the command and control directing the mob, actually using paramilitary drill and planning to direct the crowd, punch through vulnerable entrance points and so forth and then have the larger mob follow them. I've followed this pretty closely and even I still had the sense that the progression of events that day, in terms of the escalation of violence was more organic. That's wrong. The Proud Boys especially were basically directing the events.

See Also:  Whoopi Goldberg says 'both sides' guilty of rhetoric like Schumer's against Kavanaugh, must 'be more careful'

The committee largely just asserted this. They had some details and I think a few maps. But mostly within the confines of a hearing they were just asserting it: this is what we learned from our investigation. Perhaps in a latter hearing they'll go into more detail. Yesterday I noticed this video assembled by The New York Times. It's really must see work. They pull together a trove of different videos, break them down to show the role of different Proud Boy leaders and soldiers and then weave these together with court documents from the on-going cases against the various insurrectionists. It tells the story above in powerful and convincing detail.

See Also: Texas Rep Jasmine Crockett blamed Republicans for shooting: 'The blood of these children' is on their hands

In fact, it shows an additional point I hadn't understood. The mechanics of the breakthrough into the Capitol have been explained either as poor preparation by the Capitol Police or the individual heroism of Capitol Police officers. So it's either a negligent failure or an heroic one. But this reconstruction of events shows something a bit different. At several points the attempted breakthroughs failed. The defenders were able to reinforce their positions, bring in more personnel in riot gear, etc. At those points, the Proud Boys leaders directing the assaults drew back from the attack points to where they could see the whole complex more clearly. They reevaluated and chose another entry point to attack. They then issued orders to had picked members of their team to refocus on other more vulnerable entry points. It's very much a military operation.

See Also: CNN media analyst on Kimmel interview: Biden could use 'exposure' that isn't 'too challenging' for him

As I said, this wasn't just an angry mob overwhelming outnumbered defenders. There was a lot more command and control than that. And that command and control was coming from the Proud Boys. The Proud Boys and Oath Keepers collaborated in their planning and both groups bought caches of weapons and so forth. But at least from the Times reconstruction what I'm describing here was mostly the Proud Boys.

 See Also: CNN correspondent Whitney Wild downplayed the violent threat against Justice Brett Kavanaugh's life and warned about political violence from both sides, after an armed man was arrested outside the justice's home, Wednesday.  

Here's the link to the Times video. As I said, it's really something you must watch.


Saturday, June 18, 2022

CNN's Don Lemon and CNN panelist spar over Trump’s knowledge of guilt for false election claims

CNN's Don Lemon and CNN panelist spar over Trump’s knowledge of guilt for false election claims


CNN's Don Lemon and CNN panelist spar over Trump’s knowledge of guilt for false election claims

Posted: 18 Jun 2022 02:32 AM PDT

 CNN host Don Lemon got into a heated argument with a counter-terrorism expert over whether the evidence presented in the January 6 committee hearings showed the Justice Department should charge...

Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon!

Liberal hosts at "The View" took shots at ex-White House officials who worked for President Trump turning on him in media appearances, including on their political talk show.

Posted: 17 Jun 2022 07:21 PM PDT

  JAN. 6 PHOTOS SHOW MIKE PENCE IN HIDING: A new photo obtained exclusively by ABC News shows then-Vice Pres. Pence and his family in hiding after rioters broke into the Capitol on Jan. 6 — #TheView...

Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon!

Friday, June 17, 2022

CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten said Tuesday that Biden was doing "worse than Jimmy Carter" on inflation and that American people were holding him responsible.

CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten said Tuesday that Biden was doing "worse than Jimmy Carter" on inflation and that American people were holding him responsible.


CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten said Tuesday that Biden was doing "worse than Jimmy Carter" on inflation and that American people were holding him responsible.

Posted: 16 Jun 2022 09:40 PM PDT

 Enten starts by pointing out that in Biden's America, consumer sentiment is the worst it has ever been since the University of Michigan began measuring it in 1952. He adds that the reason for...

Thank you for spending some time at my site : www.tranganhnam.xyz and in my blog : http://hocdethi.blogspot.com/. I hope you come to visit again soon!